what does everyone here think is how much time a coach should get to have to prove he can improve and make a program a winner? can you still be a good coach and yet your team never seems to get to a winnign level? or after a while do you think a coach should have to prove himself that he can win.

What does everyone think on this topic?

yes he should have to prove himself

Have a talk with the kids after the first year! Read them and see what the attitude is. That is what makes a coach, where he leads the players.

and alot of times it is reletive to how much talent there is to work with. nobody ever won the kentucky derby with a mule, and it ain't the x'x and the o's its the jimmy's and the joe's are popular sayings. but i believe that it is up to coach to get the most out of his mules and his jimmy's and joe's.

See if he can make Jimmies and Joes out of Jennys and Smoes!