quote:

Originally posted by Gamecock21:

quote:

Originally posted by Bearcat in Florida:

quote:

Originally posted by Gamecock21:
If he is such a beast why can't clemson win in the "All Cupcake Conference"

It takes more than one person to put together a Championship. Answer me this, if the ACC is a "cupcake conference", why didn't USuCk win more than ONE title in their time there and how come they can't compete with Clemson?

I guess carolina wanted a challenge instead of playing in a cupcake conference. Let Clemsux make a transfer to the real confrence "SEC" and see how the can compete with the top teams in the nation.... This past year when we played clemsux we were missing all of our playmakers on defense and we played with a very young team. I can't wait to see spiller "the east and west runner" try to turn a corner on jasper brinkley...

quote:

Originally posted by Bearcat in Florida:

quote:

Originally posted by Gamecock21:

quote:

Originally posted by Bearcat in Florida:

quote:

Originally posted by Gamecock21:
If he is such a beast why can't clemson win in the "All Cupcake Conference"

It takes more than one person to put together a Championship. Answer me this, if the ACC is a "cupcake conference", why didn't USuCk win more than ONE title in their time there and how come they can't compete with Clemson?

I guess carolina wanted a challenge instead of playing in a cupcake conference. Let Clemsux make a transfer to the real confrence "SEC" and see how the can compete with the top teams in the nation.... This past year when we played clemsux we were missing all of our playmakers on defense and we played with a very young team. I can't wait to see spiller "the east and west runner" try to turn a corner on jasper brinkley...

5th year seniors Mitchell and Boyd werent exactly a "young team" but you can use all those excuses if it makes you feel better. Injuries and all that jazz. Clemson had their fair share of injuries the when sc won in The Valley. "Carolina" is in the ACC, you should know better than that one. SC only challenged for the ACC title on time in the years they were in the ACC, why on Earth would they think they could contend in the SEC? They are mediocre at best in the SEC and that is being nice about it.

quote:

Originally posted by YellowJacket99:

quote:

Originally posted by Bearcat in Florida:

quote:

Originally posted by Gamecock21:

quote:

Originally posted by Bearcat in Florida:

quote:

Originally posted by Gamecock21:
If he is such a beast why can't clemson win in the "All Cupcake Conference"

It takes more than one person to put together a Championship. Answer me this, if the ACC is a "cupcake conference", why didn't USuCk win more than ONE title in their time there and how come they can't compete with Clemson?

I guess carolina wanted a challenge instead of playing in a cupcake conference. Let Clemsux make a transfer to the real confrence "SEC" and see how the can compete with the top teams in the nation.... This past year when we played clemsux we were missing all of our playmakers on defense and we played with a very young team. I can't wait to see spiller "the east and west runner" try to turn a corner on jasper brinkley...

5th year seniors Mitchell and Boyd werent exactly a "young team" but you can use all those excuses if it makes you feel better. Injuries and all that jazz. Clemson had their fair share of injuries the when sc won in The Valley. "Carolina" is in the ACC, you should know better than that one. SC only challenged for the ACC title on time in the years they were in the ACC, why on Earth would they think they could contend in the SEC? They are mediocre at best in the SEC and that is being nice about it.

Sorry dud, the taters kept saying their basketball team was a "young" team a couple of years ago and said they would challenge for a ACC title in two years....They are challenging but I dont see it happening this year.

My point is, it's ok for you to say your team was young, but it's not for us to say the same????

We dont have gimmie games such as Duke, Miami,NC State, and UNC. Maryland, GT, WF and FSU...... teams like that are winnable games, but can go the other way. In the SEC, there are no gimmie games(with the exception of OLe Miss). There's more elite teams in the SEC than any other conference and hold our own against them. We are competitive against them, now The next step is to win them. We're almost there, just look for this year to be big for the Gamecocks.

Btw, we all know clemson wouldn't fair any better in the SEC. Just look at the series record against the SEC and you'll see what Im talking about.

quote:

Originally posted by Bearcat in Florida:

quote:

Originally posted by YellowJacket99:

quote:

Originally posted by Bearcat in Florida:

quote:

Originally posted by Gamecock21:

quote:

Originally posted by Bearcat in Florida:

quote:

Originally posted by Gamecock21:
If he is such a beast why can't clemson win in the "All Cupcake Conference"

It takes more than one person to put together a Championship. Answer me this, if the ACC is a "cupcake conference", why didn't USuCk win more than ONE title in their time there and how come they can't compete with Clemson?

I guess carolina wanted a challenge instead of playing in a cupcake conference. Let Clemsux make a transfer to the real confrence "SEC" and see how the can compete with the top teams in the nation.... This past year when we played clemsux we were missing all of our playmakers on defense and we played with a very young team. I can't wait to see spiller "the east and west runner" try to turn a corner on jasper brinkley...

5th year seniors Mitchell and Boyd werent exactly a "young team" but you can use all those excuses if it makes you feel better. Injuries and all that jazz. Clemson had their fair share of injuries the when sc won in The Valley. "Carolina" is in the ACC, you should know better than that one. SC only challenged for the ACC title on time in the years they were in the ACC, why on Earth would they think they could contend in the SEC? They are mediocre at best in the SEC and that is being nice about it.

Sorry dud, the taters kept saying their basketball team was a "young" team a couple of years ago and said they would challenge for a ACC title in two years....They are challenging but I dont see it happening this year.

My point is, it's ok for you to say your team was young, but it's not for us to say the same????

We dont have gimmie games such as Duke, Miami,NC State, and UNC. Maryland, GT, WF and FSU...... teams like that are winnable games, but can go the other way. In the SEC, there are no gimmie games(with the exception of OLe Miss). There's more elite teams in the SEC than any other conference and hold our own against them. We are competitive against them, now The next step is to win them. We're almost there, just look for this year to be big for the Gamecocks.

Btw, we all know clemson wouldn't fair any better in the SEC. Just look at the series record against the SEC and you'll see what Im talking about.

I never said anything or recall people talking about the basketball team being young. There is no question Clemson basketball has the enevitable uphill climb and we all know that.

You mention those "gimme games", Miami owns a 8-5 winning record against YOUR team, NCST 26-26, UNC OWNS you 34-17, Maryland 17-11, Ga Tech 12-9, FSU 15-3. The only team that USuCk has a winning record against those "gimme teams" is Wake Forest. I didn't have to read much further after that to know the proverbial, "we play in the SEC" was coming. Fact is, you don't know how Clemson would be in the SEC. Another fact is USuCk was in the ACC and could not compete, you can not argue that. The facts I posted blows holes in your lame argument.

The one team from the "mighty sec" we play on a regular basis is pretty much OWNED by the Tigers. Maybe we shoud drop them from the schedule and add a real team, say like Vandy?

quote:

Originally posted by YellowJacket99:

quote:

Originally posted by Bearcat in Florida:

quote:

Originally posted by YellowJacket99:

quote:

Originally posted by Bearcat in Florida:

quote:

Originally posted by Gamecock21:

quote:

Originally posted by Bearcat in Florida:

quote:

Originally posted by Gamecock21:
If he is such a beast why can't clemson win in the "All Cupcake Conference"

It takes more than one person to put together a Championship. Answer me this, if the ACC is a "cupcake conference", why didn't USuCk win more than ONE title in their time there and how come they can't compete with Clemson?

I guess carolina wanted a challenge instead of playing in a cupcake conference. Let Clemsux make a transfer to the real confrence "SEC" and see how the can compete with the top teams in the nation.... This past year when we played clemsux we were missing all of our playmakers on defense and we played with a very young team. I can't wait to see spiller "the east and west runner" try to turn a corner on jasper brinkley...

5th year seniors Mitchell and Boyd werent exactly a "young team" but you can use all those excuses if it makes you feel better. Injuries and all that jazz. Clemson had their fair share of injuries the when sc won in The Valley. "Carolina" is in the ACC, you should know better than that one. SC only challenged for the ACC title on time in the years they were in the ACC, why on Earth would they think they could contend in the SEC? They are mediocre at best in the SEC and that is being nice about it.

Sorry dud, the taters kept saying their basketball team was a "young" team a couple of years ago and said they would challenge for a ACC title in two years....They are challenging but I dont see it happening this year.

My point is, it's ok for you to say your team was young, but it's not for us to say the same????

We dont have gimmie games such as Duke, Miami,NC State, and UNC. Maryland, GT, WF and FSU...... teams like that are winnable games, but can go the other way. In the SEC, there are no gimmie games(with the exception of OLe Miss). There's more elite teams in the SEC than any other conference and hold our own against them. We are competitive against them, now The next step is to win them. We're almost there, just look for this year to be big for the Gamecocks.

Btw, we all know clemson wouldn't fair any better in the SEC. Just look at the series record against the SEC and you'll see what Im talking about.

I never said anything or recall people talking about the basketball team being young. There is no question Clemson basketball has the enevitable uphill climb and we all know that.

You mention those "gimme games", Miami owns a 8-5 winning record against YOUR team, NCST 26-26, UNC OWNS you 34-17, Maryland 17-11, Ga Tech 12-9, FSU 15-3. The only team that USuCk has a winning record against those "gimme teams" is Wake Forest. I didn't have to read much further after that to know the proverbial, "we play in the SEC" was coming. Fact is, you don't know how Clemson would be in the SEC. Another fact is USuCk was in the ACC and could not compete, you can not argue that. The facts I posted blows holes in your lame argument.

The one team from the "mighty sec" we play on a regular basis is pretty much OWNED by the Tigers. Maybe we shoud drop them from the schedule and add a real team, say like Vandy?

Hey smart guy, here are the gimmie games(again):

NC State: 5-7
UNC: 4-8
Duke: 1-11
Miami: 5-7

Reading Comprehension is the key to NOT making an ASSumption.

Here's a fact: the "lowly" Gamecocks even won an ACC title. I guess anybody can win it.

Ok drop us from your schedule and add another loss....I mean Vandy. Better yet, lets switch schedule and in 9 years see if we're still in the same spot in our adopted conference...Im sure it will be a lot EZZier for the Gamecocks in the EZZ(in reference to the 4 gimmie games above)

quote:

Originally posted by Bearcat in Florida:

quote:

Originally posted by YellowJacket99:

quote:

Originally posted by Bearcat in Florida:

quote:

Originally posted by YellowJacket99:

quote:

Originally posted by Bearcat in Florida:

quote:

Originally posted by Gamecock21:

quote:

Originally posted by Bearcat in Florida:

quote:

Originally posted by Gamecock21:
If he is such a beast why can't clemson win in the "All Cupcake Conference"

It takes more than one person to put together a Championship. Answer me this, if the ACC is a "cupcake conference", why didn't USuCk win more than ONE title in their time there and how come they can't compete with Clemson?

I guess carolina wanted a challenge instead of playing in a cupcake conference. Let Clemsux make a transfer to the real confrence "SEC" and see how the can compete with the top teams in the nation.... This past year when we played clemsux we were missing all of our playmakers on defense and we played with a very young team. I can't wait to see spiller "the east and west runner" try to turn a corner on jasper brinkley...

5th year seniors Mitchell and Boyd werent exactly a "young team" but you can use all those excuses if it makes you feel better. Injuries and all that jazz. Clemson had their fair share of injuries the when sc won in The Valley. "Carolina" is in the ACC, you should know better than that one. SC only challenged for the ACC title on time in the years they were in the ACC, why on Earth would they think they could contend in the SEC? They are mediocre at best in the SEC and that is being nice about it.

Sorry dud, the taters kept saying their basketball team was a "young" team a couple of years ago and said they would challenge for a ACC title in two years....They are challenging but I dont see it happening this year.

My point is, it's ok for you to say your team was young, but it's not for us to say the same????

We dont have gimmie games such as Duke, Miami,NC State, and UNC. Maryland, GT, WF and FSU...... teams like that are winnable games, but can go the other way. In the SEC, there are no gimmie games(with the exception of OLe Miss). There's more elite teams in the SEC than any other conference and hold our own against them. We are competitive against them, now The next step is to win them. We're almost there, just look for this year to be big for the Gamecocks.

Btw, we all know clemson wouldn't fair any better in the SEC. Just look at the series record against the SEC and you'll see what Im talking about.

I never said anything or recall people talking about the basketball team being young. There is no question Clemson basketball has the enevitable uphill climb and we all know that.

You mention those "gimme games", Miami owns a 8-5 winning record against YOUR team, NCST 26-26, UNC OWNS you 34-17, Maryland 17-11, Ga Tech 12-9, FSU 15-3. The only team that USuCk has a winning record against those "gimme teams" is Wake Forest. I didn't have to read much further after that to know the proverbial, "we play in the SEC" was coming. Fact is, you don't know how Clemson would be in the SEC. Another fact is USuCk was in the ACC and could not compete, you can not argue that. The facts I posted blows holes in your lame argument.

The one team from the "mighty sec" we play on a regular basis is pretty much OWNED by the Tigers. Maybe we shoud drop them from the schedule and add a real team, say like Vandy?

Hey smart guy, here are the gimmie games(again):

NC State: 5-7
UNC: 4-8
Duke: 1-11
Miami: 5-7

Reading Comprehension is the key to NOT making an ASSumption.

Here's a fact: the "lowly" Gamecocks even won an ACC title. I guess anybody can win it.

Ok drop us from your schedule and add another loss....I mean Vandy. Better yet, lets switch schedule and in 9 years see if we're still in the same spot in our adopted conference...Im sure it will be a lot EZZier for the Gamecocks in the EZZ(in reference to the 4 gimmie games above)

The records I posted came from the college football warehouse databank. I have no idea where yours came from but they certainly do not contain the truth. Duke also won numerous titles vs the cooties ONE.

Quit grasping at straws. Coots can't beat Clemson, what makes you think they will beat BC, FSU, VT, GT, heck any other ACC team for that fact. Correction on my stats, NCST 26-25. Oh yeah, Duke OWNS you too 24-17. Not much going on in Rawleigh huh? Have another cold one and try to find a good comeback next time around.

quote:

Originally posted by Bearcat in Florida:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by GC68:
Spiller has to run fast because he's so scared to get hit.



So what is Mike(I'm a fake) Davis' excuse for getting owned.

quote:

Originally posted by YellowJacket99:

quote:

Originally posted by Bearcat in Florida:

quote:

Originally posted by YellowJacket99:

quote:

Originally posted by Bearcat in Florida:

quote:

Originally posted by YellowJacket99:

quote:

Originally posted by Bearcat in Florida:

quote:

Originally posted by Gamecock21:

quote:

Originally posted by Bearcat in Florida:

quote:

Originally posted by Gamecock21:
If he is such a beast why can't clemson win in the "All Cupcake Conference"

It takes more than one person to put together a Championship. Answer me this, if the ACC is a "cupcake conference", why didn't USuCk win more than ONE title in their time there and how come they can't compete with Clemson?

I guess carolina wanted a challenge instead of playing in a cupcake conference. Let Clemsux make a transfer to the real confrence "SEC" and see how the can compete with the top teams in the nation.... This past year when we played clemsux we were missing all of our playmakers on defense and we played with a very young team. I can't wait to see spiller "the east and west runner" try to turn a corner on jasper brinkley...

5th year seniors Mitchell and Boyd werent exactly a "young team" but you can use all those excuses if it makes you feel better. Injuries and all that jazz. Clemson had their fair share of injuries the when sc won in The Valley. "Carolina" is in the ACC, you should know better than that one. SC only challenged for the ACC title on time in the years they were in the ACC, why on Earth would they think they could contend in the SEC? They are mediocre at best in the SEC and that is being nice about it.

Sorry dud, the taters kept saying their basketball team was a "young" team a couple of years ago and said they would challenge for a ACC title in two years....They are challenging but I dont see it happening this year.

My point is, it's ok for you to say your team was young, but it's not for us to say the same????

We dont have gimmie games such as Duke, Miami,NC State, and UNC. Maryland, GT, WF and FSU...... teams like that are winnable games, but can go the other way. In the SEC, there are no gimmie games(with the exception of OLe Miss). There's more elite teams in the SEC than any other conference and hold our own against them. We are competitive against them, now The next step is to win them. We're almost there, just look for this year to be big for the Gamecocks.

Btw, we all know clemson wouldn't fair any better in the SEC. Just look at the series record against the SEC and you'll see what Im talking about.

I never said anything or recall people talking about the basketball team being young. There is no question Clemson basketball has the enevitable uphill climb and we all know that.

You mention those "gimme games", Miami owns a 8-5 winning record against YOUR team, NCST 26-26, UNC OWNS you 34-17, Maryland 17-11, Ga Tech 12-9, FSU 15-3. The only team that USuCk has a winning record against those "gimme teams" is Wake Forest. I didn't have to read much further after that to know the proverbial, "we play in the SEC" was coming. Fact is, you don't know how Clemson would be in the SEC. Another fact is USuCk was in the ACC and could not compete, you can not argue that. The facts I posted blows holes in your lame argument.

The one team from the "mighty sec" we play on a regular basis is pretty much OWNED by the Tigers. Maybe we shoud drop them from the schedule and add a real team, say like Vandy?

Hey smart guy, here are the gimmie games(again):

NC State: 5-7
UNC: 4-8
Duke: 1-11
Miami: 5-7

Reading Comprehension is the key to NOT making an ASSumption.

Here's a fact: the "lowly" Gamecocks even won an ACC title. I guess anybody can win it.

Ok drop us from your schedule and add another loss....I mean Vandy. Better yet, lets switch schedule and in 9 years see if we're still in the same spot in our adopted conference...Im sure it will be a lot EZZier for the Gamecocks in the EZZ(in reference to the 4 gimmie games above)

The records I posted came from the college football warehouse databank. I have no idea where yours came from but they certainly do not contain the truth. Duke also won numerous titles vs the cooties ONE.

Quit grasping at straws. Coots can't beat Clemson, what makes you think they will beat BC, FSU, VT, GT, heck any other ACC team for that fact. Correction on my stats, NCST 26-25. Oh yeah, Duke OWNS you too 24-17. Not much going on in Rawleigh huh? Have another cold one and try to find a good comeback next time around.

Ah the historian is back. Naw dud, my facts came from the 07-08 season.

Well lets see, from a tater's logic of thinking(which aint much), Since we beat UGA that means we should beat GT. Right? Or another one. Since we beat UK, that mean we should beat FSU. Right?

I just tainted your logic just like a coach and his staff(not naming names) tainted a trophy in 1981(since you're such a historian).

quote:

Originally posted by YellowJacket99:

quote:

Originally posted by Bearcat in Florida:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by GC68:
Spiller has to run fast because he's so scared to get hit.



So what is Mike(I'm a fake) Davis' excuse for getting owned.

This is OWNED!!

http://youtube.com/watch?v=b3WS5Uwc5XA